MOO and VRML 2.0 ?
"George M. Ellenburg" (gme@nebula.ispace.com)
Sun, 18 Feb 1996 12:55:52 PST
On Sun, 18 Feb 1996, Kipp the Kidd wrote:
> I found that moo works fine with small text codes, such as RIPterm. a
> RIPterm picture takes about the same space as an object's description, so
> simply sending a picture instead of a descripton takes no more work for the
> MOO. The 3d net client I hope to have finished soon will use quick codes
> like RIP, and will download bitmap images from servers more capable of
> handling big things like that... a web server.
Actually, as much as I hate RIP in a BBSing/ Telecommunications
standpoint (preferring Galacticomm's Worldgroup C/S based architecture) I
definately can see where RIP could be useful for MOOing! Have you
considered talking to Telegrafix or Durand Communication on possibly
receiving the source?