MOO-cows Mailing List Archive


Re: #0:handle_uncaught_error()

> writes:
>> would it be better to have :handle_uncaught_error() called on the other
>> connection object if the object being connected to is not #0?
>What object being connected to?  We're talking about arbitrary MOO tasks here.
Well, I had a web server being connected to an object and I wanted to nicely
format the traceback messages for the web so the person can see the
traceback if they are testing their objects, was easy enough to check that
in #0, but I was wondering why it wasn't called on the object like some of
the other system-related verbs.

no sig, just me.


Home | Subject Index | Thread Index