Problem w/1.8.0, beta 3 (fwd)

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

I ran into a few problems like this, particularly around the editor, but =
mine centered around the #49:ok function.  It was because of the new =
inclusion of builtin functions into the callers() list.  some things in =
the @editor functions look to see if the current verb was called from a =
specific position within the caller() stack, which gets messed up when =
pass() is included into the callers() list.=20

----------
From:  Chris Jones[SMTP:cjones@freenet.edmonton.ab.ca]
Sent:  Friday, March 08, 1996 6:36 PM
To:  moo-cows
Subject:  Problem w/1.8.0, beta 3 (fwd)


	Hi.  When I tried upgrading my DB to v. 1.8.0b3, [from 1.7.9p2],=20
I ran into the following problem:

	#58:verbname_match, line 2: type Mismatch
	... called from #58:find_verb_named, line 11
	... called from #48:parse_invoke, line 24
	... called from #49:invoke [this =3D=3D #48], line 57
	... called from #6:@edit [this =3D=3D #2], line 6

	Can anyone help?
/---- Chris Jones ----v- PGP Fingerprint =
--------------------------------\
|42 -It's the answer! | 95 2F 8F 26 F9 CA 4B 1A D1 CA C1 5E F9 76 59 AB =
|
\---------------------^--------------------------------------------------=
/