At 09:08 AM 3/29/96 PST, Richard Taylor wrote: >Is there a way to get a time value that has a resolution higher then seconds? Such as 10ths of a second? > >Richard Taylor > Hm I think Martian made a patch that does 100,000ths of a second or something, too precise at that level though since every line of code takes different times.. but should be okay to the 10th of a second. > > >