MOO-cows Mailing List Archive
On Thu, 21 Mar 1996 firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
> I have a suggestion for an enhancement/bug fix to function_info():
> #-1:Input to EVAL, line 1: Invalid argument
> ... called from built-in function eval()
> ... called from #57:eval_cmd_string (this == #2), line 18
> ... called from #57:eval*-d (this == #2), line 10
> (End of traceback)
This seems like correct behavior to me. Though it's not documented that
the function does this in so many words, if you give it a string, and
that argument does not match the name of any known built-in function,
E_INVARG is an appropriate thing to return.
What would it return instead?
ResComp Network Support Technician, Bursley Hall
"Invisibility is in the eye of the beholder."
Home Page: http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/~cunkel/
Subject Index |