MOO-cows Mailing List Archive
Re: call_function() and $bf_FOO()
At 01:33 AM 4/28/96 -0400, Kipp the Kidd wrote:
>At 09:59 PM 4/27/96 PDT, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>>>So? If this happens, it obviously means something was programmed
>>>incorrectly and should raise an E_MAXREC. What else could it do?
>I can't believe nobody here pointed this out... From the changelog, IF THE
>VERB CONTAINING THE BUILTIN IS NOT ON #0, then $bf_FOO is called... Thus,
>if it IS on #0, then $bf_FOO ISN'T called... there's nothing recursive
I can't believe you didn't read the whole thread.. Dark_Owl was commenting
about why call_function from #0 doesn't make it a whole new call to
$bf_whatever... if that happens things will get recursive.
This is not a signature.
Subject Index |