Re: An alternate proposal for MOO-Cows

• Date: Wed, 17 May 1995 05:07:11 PDT
• From:
  "Christian A. Ratliff" <ratlifc@indikos.ctron.com>
• Reply-To:
  ratlifc@ctron.com (Christian A. Ratliff)
• Cc: MOO-Cows@parc.xerox.com
• Content-Length: 526
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
• In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 17 May 1995 00:17:13 PDT." <9505170617.AA0230@localhost>

  I prefer this proposal over the SUMMARY based idea. This holds 
substantially more value for those of us who are using MOO for non-MUD 
CMCs. It would allow me to focus on SERVER, APROG, PROG, CORE, and NET, 
and ignore Lambda and MUDish subjects.

thanks,
christian

-----
Christian A. Ratliff    / Sales Systems Analyst  / ratlifc@ctron.com
(NeXTmail & MIME okay)  / Webmaster & Consultant / ratlifc@biddeford.com
                        / Coauthor of lily       / ratlifc@lily.org
httpd://www.biddeford.com/~ratlifc/

• An alternate proposal for MOO-Cows
• From: Alex Stewart <riche@crl.com>

• Prev: An alternate proposal for MOO-Cows
• Next: Re: An alternate proposal for MOO-Cows
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows