MOO-cows Mailing List Archive
Re: Non-overrideable verbs
--- Andrew Ayre wrote:
On Mon, 29 Jul 1996, RICHARD JACOB CONNAMACHER wrote:
> 1) A database transition would, in fact, be neccessary, because verbs
> are, in LambdaCORE< defined "rw" by default, so new verbs would be
> defined as non-overridable by default, which is IMHO a bad thing. I
> would use 'p' (protected) or 'n' (non-overidable) as the perm for a
> non-overridable verb, and it has to be on for the verb to be overridable.
Why not have o for overridable and !o for non-overridable, then the verbs
would be overidable by default.
--- end of quoted material ---
Dealt with even more simply: in the server, the flag VF_NOT_O is used to
indicate that the flag is NOT set.
Subject Index |