MOO-cows Mailing List Archive



> Suppose there an object #A defines a property .example and a verb :example(),
> and suppose #B is a child of #A.  Then although #B inherits both of these from
> #A,
> ;property_info(#B, "example")
> => okay
> ;verb_info(#B, "example")
> => E_VERBNF  (assuming that #B doesn't itself define a verb :example() )
> Shouldn't both of these return errors, or else both be okay?  I know that
> inheritance has no effect on the rwxd flags of a verb, while an inherited
> property can have different rwc values than its parent's property, but still,
> it seems a little inconsistent....

The properties are actually passed down to the children. However, the 
verbs are not... Its pointless and a waste of space. The verb is called 
on the ancestor which has that verb.

For example, if I'm a $wiz, the property .email_address is on my object, 
as it is with and object that is a descendant of $player. But, the verb 
@who is _not_ on me, it is just called from $player.

Get it?


Follow-Ups: References:

Home | Subject Index | Thread Index