Re: Signal 11 Panics

• Date: Sun, 20 Oct 1996 10:42:11 PDT
• From:
  "Jason A. Maltzen" <jason@ontology.com>
• Reply-To:
  "Jason A. Maltzen" <jason@ontology.com>
• cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-To: <326A4E0D.C79@wichita.fn.net>

FYI, the SIG11 FAQ is at:

http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/

Jason
(jason@resrocket.com)

On Sun, 20 Oct 1996, Martian wrote:

> > Signal 11 is usually a memory problem, such as segment violation, etc.
> > The Linux 2.0.0 docs mention that you can get a Signal 11 when doing
> > kernel builds, and that it usually means a memory hardware problem,
> > such as a flakey RAM module or some such thing.
> 
> We're running Linux 1.2.8, actually. But, considering what we had to do
> to get the memory into the machine, this is probably a good possibility.
> I'll look into the matter.
> 
> Thank you. ::)
> 
> 

• Re: Signal 11 Panics
• From: Martian <wsmyth@wichita.fn.net>

• Prev: Re: Signal 11 Panics
• Next: TF macros.
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows