Unresolvable mail address

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Hi,

<rant>

I just want to point out once again (people are so forgetful, it seems)
that it *REALLY* pisses me off if I try to help people fix their modem
problems and they sabotage their e-mail addresses ON PURPOSE to make it
hard for me to help them.

How important do you think you are?  You get the software for free, you
want support for free, and you think it's ok that you make the task of
helping even harder, just to slow down a few spammers (won't help 
anyway)???

Fight spam, don't fight the Good People still working in the 'net.

</rant>

I'm really, really annoyed.

gert

On Sun, Jan 03, 1999 at 10:54:36PM +0100, The Post Office wrote:
> A copy of your message is being returned to you because one or more of
> the addresses you specified could not be recognized as addresses that are
> understood by, or reachable from, this system.
> 
> 
> error: unresolvable: no@spam.please
> 
> ------- Original Message follows -------
> external
> rcvdfrom greenie.muc.de ([193.174.156.65])
> with SMTP
> from <gert@greenie.muc.de>
> to <no@spam.please>
> Received: by greenie.muc.de
> 	via sendmail with stdio
> 	id <m0zwvTg-00090jC@greenie.muc.de>
> 	for no@spam.please; Sun, 3 Jan 1999 22:54:28 +0100 (MET)
> 	(Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #4 built -Feb-21)
> Message-ID: <19990103225428.H6425@greenie.muc.de>
> Date: Sun, 3 Jan 1999 22:54:28 +0100
> From: Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de>
> To: Thomas Ehrenreich <no@spam.please>, mgetty@muc.de
> Subject: Re: ELSA Microlink 56k and mgetty Problem
> References: <368EE07B.A79DE21A@gmx.de>, <19990103111110.B26205@greenie.muc.de> <368FB5BD.8251A0E5@spam.please>
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i
> In-Reply-To: <368FB5BD.8251A0E5@spam.please>; from Thomas Ehrenreich on Sun, Jan 03, 1999 at 07:23:57PM +0100
> X-mgetty-docs: http://alpha.greenie.net/mgetty/
> 
> Hi,
> 
> On Sun, Jan 03, 1999 at 07:23:57PM +0100, Thomas Ehrenreich wrote:
> > Same problem for me. With "fax-only" it works, but actually that's not
> > very satisfying...
> > 
> > That's what the log says:
> [..]
> > 10/29 07:19:22 dem   got: [0d][0a][0d][0a]RING ** found **
> > 10/29 07:19:28 dem  send: ATA[0d]
> > 10/29 07:19:28 dem  waiting for ``CONNECT''
> > 10/29 07:19:28 dem   got: [0d][0a]ATA[0d][0d][0a]NO CARRIER
> > 10/29 07:20:09 dem  found action string: ``NO CARRIER''
> 
> Hmmm.  Your whatever-modem fails to recognize incoming fax calls.
> 
> Provide more data - for starters, send a complete log showing the modem
> initialization, right from the line with the mgetty version number.
> 
> gert
> -- 
> USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
>                                                            //www.muc.de/~gert/
> Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert@greenie.muc.de
> fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de

-- 
USENET is *not* the non-clickable part of WWW!
                                                           //www.muc.de/~gert/
Gert Doering - Munich, Germany                             gert@greenie.muc.de
fax: +49-89-35655025                        gert.doering@physik.tu-muenchen.de