vgetty for non-recording ...

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Marc SCHAEFER <schaefer@alphanet.ch> wrote:

MS>> What do you think about this:
MS>
MS>I don't have any problem with it; even if it could be easily
MS>implemented with a shell script instead.

Well, scripts are sometimes very nice and flexible but as I wrote (and you
mentioned that in voice.conf too) real program-code is better. Especially
all the small lacking goodies (I just forgot them right now :) in my
opinion are/would be better implemented in C. I know testing and debugging
a script is much more easy than doing the same with C-code. Don't
misunderstand me: I DON'T want to argue against the script facility!
But writing a script containing all the stuff that is already present in
the main program to only replace one value (like non-recording) is ...
well ... subotimal.
I would be very pleased if you would change answer.c in the distribution,
so all of us can use this by default :D

  aleX
-- 
Alexander Wiedeck...............alexander.wiedeck@ku-eichstaett.de
Key fingerprint = 02 C9 F8 08 1A 36 F9 D0  22 6C 4C 4F 06 78 34 C3
When I find myself in times of trouble, ...      Speaking words of
wisdom: write in C.             Perl is not the answer write in C.