Robert Canary <rwcanary@mail.lig.bellsouth.net> wrote: > I don't see how it is possible *not* to have a ttyXx or cuaX under /dev. > mgetty+sendfax config revolves around those devices. So is this a > teaser or > can it be done? The idea is to make the handling of the /dev/ttyS0 on the behalf of another process (rlogin or ptylogin) so that there is no way out.