Elsa 56k - Firmware later than 1.29

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

On Sun, 8 Nov 1998 00:28:42 +0100, Gert Doering <gert@greenie.muc.de> wrote:

>Well, what exactly does that prove, except maybe the fact that the modem
>*hardware* is not broken?  Vendors change modem behaviour between
>firmware versions...

that's how it looks like :-(

>> >> BTW2, fax class 2.0 doesn't work, too (with V.1.29). I have to switch to
>> >> cls2, although the modem and its manual tell support for 2 and 2.0.
>> >How does "doesn't work" look like in the logs? Is the AT+FCLASS=2.0
>> >command rejected, or will it fail later.
>> 
>> 't will fail later (Firmware 1.00, later versions not tested yet):
>
>Let's see...
>
>> 06/23 16:19:35 yS1  additional info: 'Ver. 1.00 vom 06.09.1997'
>> 06/23 16:19:35 yS1  mdm_send: 'AT+FCLASS=2.0'
>> 06/23 16:19:35 yS1    got:[0a]AT+FCLASS=2.0[0d]
>> 06/23 16:19:35 yS1   mdm_command: string 'AT+FCLASS=2.0'
>> 06/23 16:19:35 yS1    got:[0d][0a]OK[0d]
>> 06/23 16:19:35 yS1   mdm_command: string 'OK' -> OK
>> 
>> [...]
>> 
>> 06/23 16:21:56 yS1    vgetty: unqueued event RECEIVED_DTMF at position
>> 0006
>> 06/23 16:21:56 yS1    vgetty: voice_handle_event got event RECEIVED_DTMF
>> with data <0>
>> 06/23 16:21:56 yS1    vgetty: trying data and fax connection
>> 06/23 16:21:56 yS1   voice command: 'AT#CLS=2.0' -> 'OK'
>> 06/23 16:21:56 yS1    vgetty: AT#CLS=2.0
>> 06/23 16:21:56 yS1    Elsa MicroLink: ERROR
>
>Hmmm.  OTOH, 1.00 is very old, so we shouldn't really bother with that
>one, I'd say.

Nope. Same error at 1.29 (from 5/98). Just tested. I *have* to add
"modem-type cls2"  to get it working. I do not want to test it with 1.52
because I don't want to flash my modem every day and 1.52 doesn't work
at all (=my first problem).

F.
-- 
http://www.imn.htwk-leipzig.de/~fdoeppe/
PGP: 1024/9B6F43AD 1997/06/01 3A 8A 31 F2 48 C9 1F CA  CF 60 3A C5 8D 1C 5F CF