FHNG50 again and again
Wolfgang Utz (wolfi@bino.w-utz.com)
Tue, 30 Dec 1997 21:46:06 +0100
Ingo Schneider <schneidi@informatik.tu-muenchen.de> writes:
>> For these two reasons I am quite sure that faxspool creates
>> g3 files that are not ok. But what can be the problem? As=20
>> mentioned above I already use pbm2g3 instead of pbmtog3
>> (I even erased pbmtog3 from my disk to be really sure and
>> did a ln -s pbmtog3 pbm2g3).
>Did you try to send a graphics, e.g. a gif as fax ?
>Then gs will not be used, so you can eliminate that source.
No graphics, anything I sent was plain ascii text, which was then con-
verted by gs. Perhaps I should try sending a graphics page and see
if I get a different behaviour.
>What faxdriver from gs are you using ?
I use dfaxhigh/dfaxlow. Perhaps I should also try faxg3 for a test...
>> It would be great if anybody had a hint for me, since I don't
>> really know what to try next at the moment...
>I have one Idea left: Perhaps your Bit-Ordering (+FBO/+FBOR)
>is wrong when sending faxes, I had a problem with that...
I think that can not be the problem, since I CAN send faxes that were
received correctly. If bit-Ordering would be t he problem, I should not
work with those faxes either, should it?
Thanks for your help
-- Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang Utz, Wolfgang.Utz@w-utz.com
>Public-Linux-Archiv: +49-9187-92044 login: gast(no password)<
.