Y2K Ken Raggios' newsletter

"Tyler Nally" (tnally@iquest.net)
Mon, 8 Mar 1999 14:18:29 -0500


Greetings Saints in Jesus name!

Here's the latest from Ken Raggio .... on the upcoming
Y2K event which commences in the not too distant future.

Bro Tyler
--
Bro Tyler Nally 
Owner Higher-Fire Oneness Apostolic E-mailing list
<tnally@iquest.net> <tgnally@prairienet.org> <tn@higherfire.org>

To e-mail all list owner/moderators, send e-mail to ...

   higher-fire-request@prairienet.org

To e-mail the higher-fire list with a message, send e-mail to ...

   higher-fire@prairienet.org

The Higher-Fire listprocessor's e-addresses for changes and queries ...

        listproc@prairienet.org 

 a) ... To Subscribe               SUB HIGHER-FIRE Your Name
 b) ... To UnSubscribe             UNSUB HIGHER-FIRE
 c) ... To Postpone Mail           SET HIGHER-FIRE MAIL POSTPONE
 d) ... To Resume Mail             SET HIGHER-FIRE MAIL ACK
 e) ... To Change to H-F Digests   SET HIGHER-FIRE MAIL DIGEST
 f) ... To Check H-F Settings      SET HIGHER-FIRE 
 g) ... To Review H-F Subscription REVIEW HIGHER-FIRE
H-F Homepage     :  http://www.prairienet.org/upci/h-f.html
H-F WWW Archives :  http://www.higherfire.org
H-F Nettiquette  :  http://www.higherfire.org/netiq.html
H-F F.A.Q.       :  http://www.higherfire.org/FAQ.html
H-F KJV Bible    :  http://www.higherfire.org/kjv
H-F QuickTour    :  http://www.prairienet.org/~tgnally/HigherFireTour.html
H-F Questionaire :  http://www.prairienet.org/upci/questions.html

  "...prefer to hear educated blessings preach than ignorant blessing!"
  - Bro Robert Jay Brown III

======================================================================

This and many other provocative prophecy articles are at 
http://www.kenraggio.com

Y2K - No guarantees that electricity will survive
Facts defy compliance statements
By Ken Raggio

I have been a Y2K alarmist for one full year now. I have traveled the gamut 
from genuine panic to cautious optimism. Some may not believe it, but I 
really don't enjoy contemplating the risks and dangers I believe are headed 
our way. If I could, I would completely dismiss myself from this issue and 
go on about my other business. Unfortunately, it seems, the Y2K dilemma 
simply won't go away.

You may have heard or read any number of news items that have circulated in 
the mainstream media in recent weeks confidently assuring us, in the words 
of Peter de Jager, that "we have broken the back of Y2K." I really wish I 
could believe him, but I don't for even one second.

Reuters News reported on March 1, "Americans should prepare for the year 
2000 computer bug like they would a hurricane, by stocking up on canned 
food and bottled water in case vital services are cut off, senators leading 
a congressional study of the problem said Sunday. Global trade could also 
be disrupted because major U.S. trading partners, including Japan and oil 
producers Venezuela and Saudi Arabia, may not be able to address the 
computer glitch in time, Utah Republican Sen. Robert Bennett and 
Connecticut Democratic Sen. Christopher Dodd said. "

Take the electrical industry for example. Two of the foremost experts in 
the electrical industry are Dick Mills and Rick Cowles. Both are veteran 
programmers and consultants to the giant power companies. Both are regular 
contributors to John Westergaard's Y2K website. Westergaard is the guy who 
originally trumpeted the Y2K alarm to Senator Patrick Moynihan who in turn 
passed the alarm on to Bill Clinton back in early 97. Mills and Cowles are 
as knowledgeable as anybody in the industry about the state of Y2K 
readiness.

Dick Mills has a reference article online called "Powerful 
Prognostications". In it, he plainly says, "Electricity customers are 
advised to make contingency plans for lack of power. Both short-term 
blackout, and LONGER-TERM power-shortage scenarios should be considered." 
Mills is concrete in his cautions. You'd better brace yourself for 
significant power outages. Don't believe CEOs and public relations 
personnel ditto heads who puppet their "Y2K ready" statements.

Rick Cowles participated in a 10,000 word interview with CBN News recently. 
He agreed with the following statement about the real risk of electrical 
failure: "it doesn't seem likely to me that the entire grid will go down, 
but instead that we're definitely going to be looking at various types of 
shortages of power, whether it's rolling blackouts or brownouts throughout 
regions and areas."

Cowles said, "I think, generically speaking, there's going to be problems 
throughout the year 2000. I think there's particularly capacity issues 
coming into the summer months. There's going to be significant issues with 
capacity problems. I've said this to you and a million other people: this 
isn't going to be a big bang on 1-1-2000." He said the most serious threat 
of regional electrical failures would most likely come "two weeks after 
1-1-2000, and then you'll see a slow recovery for 15 or 30 days to some 
kind of equilibrium where you've at least got some degree of reliability 
just about everywhere." That statement suggests a 15-30 day period with no 
degree of reliability. Afterward, "you're going to see isolated dark spots 
here and there. You're going to see brown spots here and there. But you're 
going to see more light spots than brown or black spots."

Meanwhile, electric company executives continue to tell us that ALL IS WELL 
and we have nothing to worry about. Why is there a disparity between what 
the CEOs say and the industry's technical experts?

Cowles explained why corporate executives are refusing to admit the 
electric companies' actual state of readiness. It has everything to do with 
STOCK PRICES. "If an industry trade association- and I'm talking any 
industry now, not just the electric industry- comes out and says, "Boy, our 
industry is really behind on this. We're going to have a heck of a time 
making this. We don't know if we're going to be able to provide our 
product, or if we're going to be at 50% capacity, or what, after 1/1/2000 
because we're finding this problem, that problem, and the other problem." 
What's going to happen in the stock market the next day, generically, to 
those industry's stocks? They're going to tank. And that's certainly a 
significant concern."

Dick Mills argues that unless and until all the Y2K remediation has been 
fully tested, there can be no guarantees. "Anything not tested won't run", 
is the programmer's unwritten creed. Statements like, "we expect to be 
compliant by July" hold almost no value in the real world.

The Senate Y2K Committee report on March 2 said, "Of greatest concern, are 
approximately 1,000 small, rural electric utilities that may not have the 
resources to devote to Y2K compliance."

A Department of Agriculture report stated that one of the greatest risks to 
the agricultural industry is the potential failure of Rural Electric 
Association (and other rural electric companies) services.

An Army programmer commented to me recently, "It doesn't matter how 
compliant the power plants are if the phones don't work. They won't be able 
to communicate for the purpose of managing the grid."

Rick Cowles said, "Where I am, here in New Jersey, we're 60% dependent on 
nuclear power. If the NRC takes the nukes off the line, we're certainly 
going to be hurting." And the likelihood of the nukes shutting down?

Perhaps the most significant news was reported by WorldNewsDaily on January 
22, 1999, "Concern over potential safety hazards related to the Y2K bug 
prompted the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to announce that all nuclear 
power plant operators would be required to offer written confirmation that 
they had a program under way to deal with potential Y2K problems. The 
requirement specifies that nuclear power plants must be "Y2K ready no later 
than July 1, 1999." Nuclear plants reportedly require up to four months to 
shut down, suggesting that nuclear shutdowns could begin as early as this 
summer if plants cannot demonstrate Y2K readiness. The Nuclear Information 
and Resource Service has filed a petition with the Nuclear Regulatory 
Commission calling for all nuclear plants that are not Y2K compliant to be 
shut down no later than December 1, 1999.

A controversial article written by David M. Bresnahan of WorldNetDaily on 
January 11 reported that an officer from the National Guard Bureau in 
Washington revealed that "the National Guard is planning COMEX/MOBEX, an 
exercise to practice a full mobilization of all 480,000 members of the 
National Guard. It will take place May 1 without the use of phones, tele  
vision, or radio. The exercise is planned to prepare for a possible 
mobilization in the event computer failures from the Y2K bug cause major 
disruptions of power, telecommunications, transportation and banking. "

"The latest plan I've heard," said another Guard official, "is to break the 
power grid into several hundred little grids. Right now it's one major grid 
broken into four subgrids. If they don't break it into several hundred 
little grids, in conjunction with the phone system not working properly, 
they won't get their feedback mechanism right and they'll burn up the 
lines."

Why is the National Guard and FEMA activating nearly A HALF-MILLION 
SOLDIERS to prepare for a nationwide blackout, if there really is no 
legitimate risk?

That facts speak louder than the compliance statements. Fact is, nobody can 
guarantee that trains will deliver coal. Fact is, nobody can guarantee that 
gas and oil will be available for electric plants, trains or even the 
public. Fact is, nobody can guarantee that nuclear plants won't be taken 
offline. Fact is, these are all VERY HIGH RISKS!

What does that mean to you and me? It is imperative that we face the high 
probability of at least large-scale, short-term blackouts. No one in 
American can guarantee us that there will not be massive blackouts lasting 
for several days. It is a stark reality. If we fail to acknowledge that 
fact, and fail to prepare accordingly, it's going to be VERY COLD and VERY 
DARK in ten months. Too many people in high places are leaking genuinely 
dreadful warnings.

What is a reasonable contingency plan for a typical family? It's hard to 
say exactly, but you must take into considerations the basic needs of your 
household.

Will you have adequate heating if you have no electricity for 7-10 days in 
your region? Will your house freeze? Will your water pipes burst? Will your 
children be able to stay warm? Will you be able to cook? Will you have 
adequate food stored away? These are not irrational concerns. Sitting in a 
freezing house, in a frozen community, for nine days could prove to be much 
more than you and your family are capable of enduring.

Wood stoves and kerosene heaters are going to be in extremely short supply 
by the time most folks decide they had better get prepared. Food, water, 
heat and cooking are four things you can't afford to be without. Now is the 
time to act.

If you have not yet seriously considered a Y2K survival plan, please visit 
my website and check out the several articles on Y2K at 
http://www.kenraggio.com If you need survival tips, s

If you can't understand why Y2K is an issue for Bible Prophecy, read the 
online articles "Is Y2K the fall of Babylon?" and "Lucifer will have Chaos 
before God intervenes" at my website.

God bless you all,
Ken Raggio
3/4/99

If you want off this list, send a blank email to REMOVE@kenraggio.com

If you are reading this offline and want to subscribe to this newsletter, 
send a blank email to SUBSCRIBE@kenraggio.com