Dangerous Conclusion?

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

Sister Yohnk;

I have followed the threads fairly closely. I have monitored what has been said and by who. I am going to tell you something, in all honesty, I am glad that I do not attend Either your, Brother Reeds, or Brother Clifton's church. I am thankful that I have a Pastor that preaches to me that I can look at what people say and glean gems of wisdom in it. Does he agree with Brother Startcher, not always. Does he judge him, no. 

You (meaning You, Brother Reed, and Brother Clifton) have judged him from the very beginning. You have called him a liberal, yet he is not. You have attacked when none was needed. You have guarded the FAITH, that did not need guarding. You have persisted in this IDEA that you are the keeper of the faith on this list. You are not keepers of the FAITH on this list, the moderators are. We have worked hard to create an environment that would welcome all apostolics. 

We want the ones that you dont want, as much as we want the ones you want. They are not evil people, they have a different set of standards, difference in belief, but the basic doctrine is the same. We need to drop the labels. Unless something is clearly false doctrine, then we need endeavor to meet the need of acceptance without compromise of our beliefs.

--
Kirk Moore
CDG analyst II
DCAC/MRM Support

"Black holes are created when God divides by zero"