Fw: Re: Dangerous Conclusion?

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

In a message dated 3/30/99 7:52:04 AM Mountain Standard Time, lyohnk@juno.com
writes:

<< 
 Conclusion: Bro Starcher tells me I have made assumptions, I seem to
 vilify, I am willing but need to be informed and not offensive, God is
 bound by my intellect and if the forefathers possessed my attitude there
 would have never been an Apostolic movement, asks me why I am obsessed,
 says all this talk is unbalanced, that I seem to want to wrest salvation
 from God's hands, tells me to find out beliefs before I make
 condemnations, infers I deny similarities, tells me he is more patient
 than I, and, lastly, tells me I have violated God's sovereignty.
 
 If you have the right to say these things and be under the umbrella of
 "love", then afford us the same right. I am not mad. I am pointing out
 what I see to be the double standard.
 
 Lynne Yohnk >>


An I concur:      Bro. Fitzgerel