beards and such.

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

> The court concluded  that it was indeed recognized by society that the
> proper female attire was a dress or skirt, but fashions were subject
> to change. It sadly annouced that when looking at society to determine
> whether such change had actually taken place, it looked to the
> churches as the dictator of appropriate attire and there found no
> evidence that such a standard was being maintained.

This sound awfully anecdotal...

> Here is a perfect example. The world looks to the church. It may
> argue, but it looks to the church for authority.

But I do get your point: there's those here who claim the church should
look to the world and Walt Disney for its standards, and you claim it
should be the other way around.  Amen to that.

Richard M.