Pulpit Language

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

On Sun, 8 Sep 1996 14:45:37 -0400, you wrote:

>In a message dated 96-09-08 02:00:11 EDT, mbasset@iconn.net (Mark Bassett)
>writes:
>
><< Sociologically, and from the earler society which DID impart moral
> quality with the wording, the term SODOMITE predates HOMOSEXUAL. >>
>
>Then why not use the word Sodomite when preaching?  That's not a word that
>borders on profanity, yet it's definitely stronger than homosexual.  I have
>no problem at all with using that word.  So why is it that some have such an
>attachment to the "fag" word that they simply cannot give it up?

Lets just cut to the quick. I think the problem Bro. Brown is that you
perceive "profanity" where others do not.

By the way, I dont think I have ever used the "fag" word before or
since I was saved. I just have a problem with labeling things
off-limits because certain people think so.

I certainly feel there is nothing "sacreligious" about plain talk.