Pulpit Language
mark mathis (annm@juno.com)
Mon, 09 Sep 1996 08:57:50 EDT
You have said in this post and in the following posts what I was not
able to put in words. There must not be any gray areas so that sinners
don't understand what we are saying . There were some things I was
practicing as a nominal christian because they had never been named . I
thank God for a plain spoken , fire breathing pastor. who made things
plain. then and only then could I repent. He used to preach that the
reason that God gave a great victory to a woman is that the men of Isreal
were to panty waisted to go into battle without Debora holding their
hand. We're in a battle folks , garments rolled in blood, shouting ,
trumpet blasts. We don't say , excuse me , while I run this sword though
you. There is a vast difference between profanity and making thing plain
where there can be no doubt as to what we're saying (preaching). I'm
sorry the holy of hollies has been opened to whosoever will we should be
just as holy on the street corner as we are in the pulpit. Fact is we
probably should be preaching on the street corner where the sinners are .
MARK MATHIS
annm@juno.com
P.O. BOX 415
CEDAR PARK, TEX. 78630
On Mon, 09 Sep 1996 00:56:47 GMT mbasset@iconn.net (Mark Bassett) writes:
>On Sun, 8 Sep 1996 14:45:37 -0400, you wrote:
>
>>In a message dated 96-09-08 02:00:11 EDT, mbasset@iconn.net (Mark
>Bassett)
>>writes:
>>
>><< Sociologically, and from the earler society which DID impart moral
>> quality with the wording, the term SODOMITE predates HOMOSEXUAL. >>
>>
>>Then why not use the word Sodomite when preaching? That's not a word
>that
>>borders on profanity, yet it's definitely stronger than homosexual.
>I have
>>no problem at all with using that word. So why is it that some have
>such an
>>attachment to the "fag" word that they simply cannot give it up?
>
>Lets just cut to the quick. I think the problem Bro. Brown is that you
>perceive "profanity" where others do not.
>
>By the way, I dont think I have ever used the "fag" word before or
>since I was saved. I just have a problem with labeling things
>off-limits because certain people think so.
>
>I certainly feel there is nothing "sacreligious" about plain talk.
>
>