Hair
"Mike Hughes" (mhughes@airmail.net)
Sat, 28 Sep 1996 22:31:36 -0600
> Date: Sat, 28 Sep 1996 21:04:44 -0700
> Reply-to: higher-fire@prairienet.org
> From: Ray Harrell <harrell@execpc.com>
> To: higher-fire@prairienet.org
> Subject: Re: Hair
> > Where is it written that the split end is not just as much the natural
> > hair as the rest of the shaft of hair ?
>
> Someone has yet to show me a scripture that forbids women from cutting
> their hair. There are references to CUSTOMS concerning women who are
> "uncovered" or in other words, appear as the men do.
>
> This was the whole basis of this scripture, I reiterate....that the
> women should not wear their hair like the men, because in doing so, they
> dishonor their heads (namely, the men).
>
> This custom that they were contentious about was not concerning the
> length of hair, but masculinity in the women, and effiminacy in the men!
>
> Remember, to the same church, Paul warned of women wearing things that
> pertained to a man....
>
> The Corinthian church obviously had a problem with cross-dressing and
> people taking on traits of the other gender. (for lack of better words).
> This was the only reason this matter came up.
>
> In I Corinthians 11, there is no commandment that women should not cut
> their hair. Only that they were to remain covered, and the men uncovered.
>
> If we are going to use that scripture to forbid cutting of hair then we
> must go this way:
>
> Hair is given for a covering. Therefore, men are not to have ANY hair on
> their heads, because if a man has any hair, he would be covered. If that
> is the case, then any amount of hair women have would be ok since hair is
> given for a covering...which means she may cut it to any length as long
> as she is not shaven bald.
>
> But we know that's not the correct way to interpret this scripture,
> because that's not what it was talking about.
>
> Again, this CUSTOM was dealing SOLELY with the women making themselves to
> appear as the men....
>
>
>
Mike Hughes
mhughes@airmail.net