Melchizedek

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

mark mathis wrote:

> 
> On this subject I will agree to disagree. This subject can not  be
> intellectually examined for the wisdom of man is but foolishness to God.

I reply:

I will agree to disagree, but I do think that it can be both and
intellectually and spiritually discussed.


Mark Mathis also wrote:
> As I said before
> most apostolics do not know who he really is or who we really are.
>     I know that many apostolics ( especially ones out of bible schools)
> think if you believe that Melchizedek is God (Jesus) then you are
>  trinity. 

I reply:

I do not "believe that you are trinity", but I do believe that you are
teaching a trinitarian argument when you teach that Melchizedek was a
theophany.  

Mark Mathis also wrote:

I do know what has been revealed to
> me by the Holy Ghost.

I reply:

Our revelations must always be supported by the word and never be in a
disagreement.

God Bless,

Andy (Melchizedek, you da Man) Gossett