Revelation is a MUST?

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

I think its both, knowledge and revelation, because otherwise, Jesus could not 
have mildly rebuked Nicodemus, for his lack of knowledge about what the 
Scripture foretold. If it was strictly revelation then the problem would be 
God's, for not giving that revelation to Nicodemus. I believe the Scripture is 
plain enough that its message may be seen by all, but they are not "received as 
the Scripture you included says. After all the devil believes the doctrine of 
one God and he doesn't have revelation from the indwelling Holy Ghost. I feel 
it can be seen by knowledge, but the working of God's Spirit is what makes it a 
"revelation" to us.

Frank Vandenburg


> I vote for revelation.
>
> " But the natural man recieveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for
> they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are
> spiritually discerned." 1 Cor. 2:14
>
> Lynne Yohnk
>
> ___________________________________________________________________
> You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
> Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
> or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
>