Haste making Waste on Higher-Fire

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

castnavara@earthlink.net wrote:

> Bro Brown:
>
> >I would prefer that the 4 seperate replies be made instead.  Here is
> >why:  the threading logic of better mail readers will associate each
> >reply with the message it is the reply to.  If you bunch them all
> >together, then you loose this nice feature.  BTW the archiver uses
> >this kind of threading logic too.
>
> Me:
>
> I would also like to add my two cents (actually well thought out and after
> having had my fill of a DQ Peanut Buster Parfie).  I feel that answering
> each post will save people from having to put there posts into an even more
> confusing format like this....
>
> [Them]

If this keeps up we might have a dollar soon  :o).....so here is my $0.02 worth

The individual posts is the only way to go, otherwise a person would spend hours
trying to get the post written and people would spend hours trying to read them.
This way we can blast those posts from those long winded people we dont care to
read :o) .

The readability that has been mentioned is also a very valid point.

Lord Bless;
Bro. Bill Clifton
woodrow_@nettaxi.com
http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Plains/1226/index.html