The Apostolic Dialogue With Catholics 3

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

In a message dated 10/23/98 6:20:07 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
yhclifto@Oakland.edu writes:

<< > 
 > In a message dated 10/23/98 1:12:52 PM Mountain Daylight Time,
 > yhclifto@Oakland.edu writes:
 > 
 > 
 > Maybe we could call it a diversity of truth or maybe a diversity of a lie.
 > That is what's neat about this type of thinking, you can go either way, you
 > think.
 > 
 > Pastor Fitzgerel
 > 
 > 
 Pastor, Please forgive my wording,
 
 Actualy those of us who are not inffable have some truth and some lies.
 The 'diversity' that I was suggesting might be tollerated are areas where
 who telling truth and who might be mistaken (lies in your words) will cost
 no one their salvation and as such are topics for discussion.
 
Pastor Fitzgerel
No, brother I was not suggesting that you were in any way lying, and I am
sorry if I offended you.  The wording of that paragraph was amusing to me.  So
please bear with me if I responded to it in my diverse way.

You
 I was not suggesting God's truth contains diversity (althought I listen to
 diverse opinions because I don't have all the answers.)
 
Pastor Fitzgerel
And neither was suggesting that I am right all the time.

you
 I did not mean truth and unity are not ideals to strive for.
 
 My pastor tollerates a lot of diversity of opionion just to keep the
 congregation united.
 
 
 Maybe your congregation is closer to a unit truth than the one where I
 attend, but I hope you tollerate us for the sake of the Acts 2:38 message,
 
 
 			Love you in Jesus Name,
  >>

I wish that you closing statements was accurate, but no we all have to realize
that we look through a glass darkly in many of the non-essential areas of
God's word.  Again I didn't mean to offend you and apologize for it.

Love you in Jesus Name also.

Pastor Fitzgerel