Steve I'm still confused

• Messages sorted by:[ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]

 Bro.  Starcher;
 I am not worried about offending the neo-conservatives, Evangelicals. 
They are among the harshest critics of Apostolic Pentecostalism and
would like nothing better than to see the Apostolic movement  be
understood by all to be heretical and cultic.  As far as offending the
Barthians, I sincerely doubt it.  The neo-Fundamentalists have  great
difficulty with Barthian theology, his acceptance of Biblical criticism,
and his rethinking of the traditional dogma's of the Church, especially
the doctrine of the Trinity.  Incidentally, the correct theological
designation for Barthians is neo-orthodox.  

 Mike:
 Neo-fundamentalists, Neo-Orthodoxy, neo-consevatives, Barthians, this is all
worthless drivel.  Why are you and others so concerned about the false
teachings of false prophets?
 Who cares about what Barth says?  Why would I want to study the interworkings
of Albrights theology?  Don't you believe as John said:
II Jn 1:7
7	For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Jesus
Christ is come in the flesh.  This is a deceiver and an antichrist.

 They believe that the second person of a Trinity came in the flesh.  They do
not believe in the true God. 
 
                                        Mike Reed