DEBATE-ing on Crossfire
Bill Clifton (@nettaxi.com)
Wed, 28 Oct 1998 07:34:45 -0700
Matthew Shaw wrote:
> Just a very brief opinion, but I don't think it is a good idea to pit our
> ideas against one another in any formal way.
>
> One thing I appreciate about Higher-Fire despite its diversities of opinion
> is the fact that it affords us the opportunity to understand others as
> individuals, note our personal progress in growing in grace and knowledge
> and gives us a forum to affirm our brotherhood.
>
> I don't think constructing debate teams is going to do anything toward
> brotherly love or fraternal unity.
>
> Unity should be the thrust of this forum not the rigid championing of our
> respective persuasions. We all have a common, Apostolic core in place, and
> let's work from there as we have been.
>
> God's best,
>
> Bro. Matthew Shaw
Strange....this was the just of a post I started this morning. I fear that
"debating" will not edify the body but cause more division. I find myself in the
middle of a lot of issues here and if it is a debate forum that is not allowed.
Also from my experience few people will get involved in the debating.
I was involved in a general Christian debate forum and it was hard to post, hard
to follow and died. I pray that 1) Crossfire has better sucess & 2) that Higher
Fire does not lose its fire! ;o)
Lord Bless;
Bro. Bill Clifton
woodrow_@nettaxi.com
http://www.geocities.com/Heartland/Plains/1226/index.html