Re: $handle_uncaught_error

• Date: Thu, 15 Feb 1996 22:32:59 PST
• From:
  Nicholas Ingolia <ningolia@neon.ci.lexington.ma.us>
• Cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-To: <199602160012.QAA27621@kaiwan009.kaiwan.com>

On Thu, 15 Feb 1996 slayer@kaiwan.com wrote:

> >Is there any chance $handle_uncaught_error could be called with another
> >argument made up of a list of all the variables defined in the tracebacking
> >verb, along with their values?  Or maybe even all of the variables in all
> >the calling verbs?
> >
> that sounds like a good idea, or at least the builtin ones like argstr,
> dobjstr etc.
> no sig, just me.
> 
 
I have nearly completed a package to be installed in extensions.c that 
will include a builtin that functions as either callers() or task_stack(), 
except that it lists all variables in each stack frame.  I think that 
this will be able to do what you'd like...I will be posting an 
announcement here soon giving a URL for the package and a description of 
the functions included.

ningolia@[oxygen|neon|stu].ci.lexington.ma.us
ingolia@molbio.mgh.harvard.edu

• Re: $handle_uncaught_error
• From: slayer@kaiwan.com

• Prev: Re: $handle_uncaught_error
• Next: (Fwd) A few questions
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows