MOO-cows Mailing List Archive
Re: ethics discussion
Ben Jackson <firstname.lastname@example.org> did not have a good time...
>In message <199602261617.LAA18720@kanga.INS.CWRU.Edu> , Seth I. Rich wrote:
>> It's a difficult
>> thing to have, for example, a RL mess which takes place in part on the
>> MOO. It takes an amazingly responsible person (IMO) to resist the
>> temptation that exists when in such a situation.
>As someone who was a victim of a less than amazingly responsible person
>when such a situation arose, I must say that I don't think a code of
>ethics would have made a bit of difference. She was out for revenge
>and felt that destroying hundreds (thousands?) of hours of my work was
>a reasonable "punishment." I think she did it because she could get
>away with it. I'm sure if murder were restricted only by a "code of
>ethics", she would have considered killing me.
There's no excuse for deliberately destroying work.
That's about as low as you can get.
OTOH, I make off-site backups of every scrap of code I write.
Even the most well-intentioned MOO administrator might end up
losing the database. When we first started Id, there was a
terrible crash right while the database was being backed up
onto tape -- and it turned out that the site was using only
a single tape to backup to. So we lost several month's work,
although we'd luckily not had too many characters as yet.
But I had some more-or-less up-to-date off-site backups
of just my code so I was OK.
Tom Ritchford email@example.com, firstname.lastname@example.org
Verge's "Little Idiot" -- Music for the mentally peculiar.
Subject Index |