1.8.0

• Date: Sun, 10 Mar 1996 09:48:10 PST
• From:
  Kipp the Kidd <mcmudge@mailbox.syr.edu>
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"

At 05:42 PM 3/9/96 PST, Pavel Curtis wrote:
>-- Verbs defined on #0 are no longer subject to the wiz-only permissions check
 [snip]
>-- If a built-in function FOO has been made wiz-only [snip] and a call is made
    [snip] the server first checks to see if the verb #0:bf_FOO exists.

Woo woo Pavel!

I guess this means the last of Pavel's work on MOO :(  Have you found anyone
to take over MOO?

Oops -- guess not..  Just saw the binary bug.

- Kipp
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
GCS/CC d- s+:- a16 C++ UL++++ P+ L++ E-? W+ !N--@ !o-- K->K++++++
w++(--) O- M-- V--? PS++(+) PE(--) Y+ PGP-? t+ 5(+) X++ R+++(*)
!tv b+ DI++++ D++++ G e* h!()(*) r+ !y+
------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------
-----BEGIN NOT SO GEEKY BLOCK-----
MOO projects:
  RPG Minimal.db:  paradigm.microwave.com 5000
  MOO2000:         moo.microwave.com 2000
  MundoHispano:    europa.syr.edu 8888
------END NOT SO GEEKY BLOCK------

• Prev: Re: 0-based indices for verbs in old code...
• Next: 1.8.0 bug?
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows