Re: Bug in @send in LambdaCore25Dec95.db

• Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 11:30:32 PST
• From:
  Christopher Unkel <cunkel@us.itd.umich.edu>
• cc: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com
• Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-To: <199603210755.BAA05011@borg.reshall.ksu.edu>

On Wed, 20 Mar 1996 wizkid@borg.reshall.ksu.edu wrote:

> For posterity, here are the changes I made.
> 
> #49:ok this none this 
> 
> (Out) 
> 4: 	elseif (length(c = callers()) < 2 ? player ==
>         this.active[who] | c[2][1] == this || ($perm_utils:controls(c[2][3],
>         this.active[who]) || c[2][3] == $generic_editor.owner))
> ---
>  (In)
> 4: 	elseif (length(c = callers()) < 2 ? player ==
> 	this.active[who] | c[2][1] == this || (c[2][1] == #-1 && c[2][3] ==
> 	#-1 && c[2][4] == #-1) || ($perm_utils:controls(c[2][3],
> 	this.active[who]) || c[2][3] == $generic_editor.owner))

This will eliminate the tracebacks.  But (someone correct me if I'm 
wrong) it doesn't perform the permission check that it used to.  If 
callers()[2] is from a built-in, then it should look at whatever the next 
element of callers() that does *not* represent a built-in, and apply the 
:controls permission check to that entry.

  --Chris                           cunkel@engin.umich.edu
    ResComp Network Support Technician, Bursley Hall
    "Invisibility is in the eye of the beholder."
    Home Page: http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/~cunkel/

• Re: Bug in @send in LambdaCore25Dec95.db
• From: wizkid@borg.reshall.ksu.edu

• Re: Bug in @send in LambdaCore25Dec95.db
• From: wizkid@borg.reshall.ksu.edu

• Prev: Re: Bug in @send in LambdaCore25Dec95.db
• Next: Re: Bug in @send in LambdaCore25Dec95.db
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows