MOO-cows Mailing List Archive


Re: Bug in @send in LambdaCore25Dec95.db

Ok, I realize what you are saying ... I now walk through the chain 
doing the c[x][1] == #-1 && .. check to find the next non-builtin.
Thanks for pointing out the error in my reasoning. Another example
of coding and sleep not mixing :).

--- Zach Metzinger (Succubus)

> This will eliminate the tracebacks.  But (someone correct me if I'm 
> wrong) it doesn't perform the permission check that it used to.  If 
> callers()[2] is from a built-in, then it should look at whatever the next 
> element of callers() that does *not* represent a built-in, and apply the 
> :controls permission check to that entry.
>   --Chris                 
>     ResComp Network Support Technician, Bursley Hall
>     "Invisibility is in the eye of the beholder."
>     Home Page:


Home | Subject Index | Thread Index