MOO-cows Mailing List Archive
Re: Bug in @send in LambdaCore25Dec95.db
Ok, I realize what you are saying ... I now walk through the chain
doing the c[x] == #-1 && .. check to find the next non-builtin.
Thanks for pointing out the error in my reasoning. Another example
of coding and sleep not mixing :).
--- Zach Metzinger (Succubus)
> This will eliminate the tracebacks. But (someone correct me if I'm
> wrong) it doesn't perform the permission check that it used to. If
> callers() is from a built-in, then it should look at whatever the next
> element of callers() that does *not* represent a built-in, and apply the
> :controls permission check to that entry.
> --Chris firstname.lastname@example.org
> ResComp Network Support Technician, Bursley Hall
> "Invisibility is in the eye of the beholder."
> Home Page: http://www-personal.engin.umich.edu/~cunkel/
Subject Index |