0-based indices for verbs in old code...

• Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 20:52:57 PST
• From:
  Judy Anderson <yduj@cs.stanford.edu>
• cc: moo-cows.PARC@xerox.com
• In-Reply-to: "\"John P. Wilson\"'s message of Thu, 21 Mar 1996 11:24:55 PST <Pine.SGI.3.91.960321132134.3760A-100000@WavOpt431.tbe.com>hear th"
• Posted-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 20:52:57 -0800 (PST)

   Date: Thu, 21 Mar 1996 11:24:55 PST
   From: "John P. Wilson" <paladin@wavopt431.tbe.com>

   Will there be a clean version of LambdaCore soon that eliminates using 
   the zero base for accessing verbs?  I enabled the old behavior by 
   defining $server_options.support_numeric_verbname_strings and setting it 
   equal to one.  Or has someone compiled a list of verbs and fixes that 
   addresses this problem?

A new LambdaCore will be released only after LambdaMOO is running 1.8
(which won't be until the rest of you all have gotten the bugs out :-)
and we've had an opportunity to put some of the new features into play.
Seth is trying to make a conglomerated patch to make things at least
work decently (such as the @display problem you mentioned).  We don't
have an ETA on that, but it will be fairly soon.

      Judy Anderson yclept yduJ          'yduJ' rhymes with 'fudge'
 yduJ@cs.stanford.edu (personal mail)   yduJ@harlequin.com (work-related)
	Join the League for Programming Freedom, lpf@uunet.uu.net

• 0-based indices for verbs in old code...
• From: "John P. Wilson" <paladin@wavopt431.tbe.com>

• Prev: 0-based indices for verbs in old code...
• Next: Re: 0-based indices for verbs in old code...
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows