[kent@cme.nist.gov: Re: New patch release 1.8.0p6 of LambdaMOO server and manual]

• Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 16:21:09 -0600
• From:
  "Robert J. Brown" <rj@eli.wariat.org>

------- Start of forwarded message -------
Return-Path: nop@ccs.neu.edu
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 08:02:17 PST
From: kent@cme.nist.gov (Ernie Kent)
To: moo-cows@parc.xerox.com, kbobrow@parc.xerox.com
Subject: Re: New patch release 1.8.0p6 of LambdaMOO server and manual
Sender: MOO-Cows-Errors@parc.xerox.com
Precedence: bulk
Resent-From: clue-cows <nop@nop.com>
Errors-To: clue-cows <nop@nop.com>


Kimberly Bobrow <kbobrow@parc.xerox.com> wrote:

> A more substantially changed version of the server (1.9.0) is
> underway, and may appear in April.  It will be available under the
> same terms that previous versions have been distributed under, except
> that it will assert AT&T's copyright over the new material, and give
> my name and address instead of Pavel's.  I may give it a name

Can you explain AT&T's interpretation of 'the same terms'? Also, what
are the implications of the AT&T copyright according to AT&T?
I'm a bit gun-shy on this after some of the discussion concerning Xerox's
refusal to affirm or deny the terms Pavel printed on the previous versions.

Thanks
------- End of forwarded message -------

• Prev: [kbobrow@parc.xerox.com: Re: dictionary server?]
• Next: [kira@metronet.com: dictionary server?]
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows