MOO-cows Mailing List Archive
Re: wish lists
Date: Thu, 25 Jul 1996 11:43:15 PDT
From: email@example.com (Ninoles, Fabien: DGSE)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 1996 12:40 PM
Subject: Re: wish lists
At 12:11 PM 7/23/96 PDT, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>Likewise, reading d.number would instead return the result of
>which wouldn't be defined in this case.
>*I* think this would be extremely useful and reduce the amount and
>of code considerably, particularly integrated with (a). It would avoid
>extremely nasty o.description and o:description() `feature', for a
>What do people think?
hmmm... isn't what you suggest more complex? Reminds me of the 'verbing
properties' thread that was going on earlier.. seems to me just having
object:description() do the number would be just fine.
I'm agree with slayer on this one... I know some objects
who didn't rely entirely on .description in their :description().
Some are context sensitive (example : rely on which kind of
player calls (it's a wiz, a guest?) ) and doing verbing properties
just make it more tricky to done (but still possible).
IMVHO, I really appreciate the already suggested dynamic type-casting
on user defined type and I think that loadable module (that's it... a
kind of MacMOO plug-ins) can be a good idea (maybe in run-time :).
Subject Index |