Re: LPMOO [LPMOO]

• Date: Tue, 5 Sep 1995 12:02:02 PDT
• From:
  Chuck Adams <cadams@weather.brockport.edu>
• Cc: zonny@alibaba.dds.nl, MOO-Cows@parc.xerox.com
• Content-Length: 661
• Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950904151810.18104A@kong.syr.edu> from "Kipp the Kidd" at Sep 4, 95 12:24:17 pm

Kipp the Kidd drew these hieroglyphs:
> > Does anyone have a hunch as to where i'm wrong ? I know this is a 
> > LAMBDAmoo mailing list :) But i don't know anywhere else ;-P
> 
> I have one thing to say about this:
> index("moo-cows","lambda")==0 && if(disagree) me:show(where it says so) endif
> Nowhere in any rules do I see 'lambdamoo only' for the moo-cows list, and 
> if you disagree, show me where it says so.
> (index("LPMOO","MOO") && index("LambdaMOO","MOO")==1)
> LPMOO is a type of MOO, so I guess it's ok to talk about it here, eh?
> 

i agree -- but if people are using keyword scanners, it'd be good
etiquette to put [LPMOO] in the subject line.

• Re: LPMOO
• From: Kipp the Kidd <mcmudge@mailbox.syr.edu>

• Prev: Re: LPMOO
• Next: LPMOO FAQ 9/17/95
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows