Eval-d has some behavior that confuses me:
;me.temp = {1, 2, 3}
=> {1, 2, 3}
>eval-d me.temp[5] = 5
=> 5
>;me.temp
=> E_RANGE (Range error)
Wouldn't it be more intuitive if the eval-d expression returned the value
E_RANGE, but left the property's value unchanged? Right now it actually sets
the property me.temp's value to E_RANGE.
-- Amy