Re: Does the new LambdaMOO core support Web?

• Date: Sun, 14 Apr 1996 12:21:21 PDT
• From:
  cadams@weather.brockport.edu (Chuck Adams)
• cc: MOO-Cows.PARC@xerox.com
• Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
• Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
• In-Reply-to: "<v02130503ad947b6eb53a@[132.76.55.130]> from \"Gustavo Glusman\" at Apr 12, 96 02:33:48 pm"

Gustavo Glusman drew these hieroglyphs:
> 
> Rog wrote:
> >Hacking the server or doing anything that depends on DB file format
> >(which is only sparsely documented and likely to change) is a less good
> >idea.
> 
> Allow me to disagree. From our experience, the simplest method for logging
> is to fileappend() using FUP. Simple, quick, no scale-up problems, doesn't
> change the size of the database, has many other advantages.
> 

I have one reservation there: don't all FUP operations open the file,
write it, then close it again?  It's a lot like leaving someone voice
mail by making one phone call per sentence.

I wouldn't mind having some FUP operations that treat files like MOO
connections.  Sorta like the familiar socket model.

• RE: Does the new LambdaMOO core support Web?
• From: bmgustav@bioinformatics.weizmann.ac.il (Gustavo Glusman)

• Prev: RE: Does the new LambdaMOO core support Web?
• Next: Re: Does the new LambdaMOO core support Web?
• Index: MOO-cows
• Thread: MOO-cows